Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-18 19:45:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E325E312EB966761BFDF34E830499DCE7654329BD72B9FB1B3FCAF6DBE5F72A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Trata-se de revista vexatória, que obriga visitantes a se despirem para uma inspeção íntima. A decisão visa substituir essa prática por scanners e outros métodos. O ministro Alexandre de Moraes suspendeu o julgamento no plenário virtual (18/10/24). [1][2][3] [1] https://noticias.uol.com.br/ultimas-noticias/agencia-brasil/2024/10/18/stf-retoma-julgamento-sobre-legalidade-de-revista-intima-nos-presidios.htm [2] https://www.terra.com.br/noticias/stf-tem-maioria-para-proibir-revista-vexatoria-em-presidios,71f48584dbeb0509aae4455698c0d26a5r95jena.html [3] https://www.cartacapital.com.br/justica/maioria-do-stf-vota-contra-revista-intima-para-entrada-em-presidios/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847322477124264029
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E325E312EB966761BFDF34E830499DCE7654329BD72B9FB1B3FCAF6DBE5F72A
  • createdAtMillis - 1729280718641
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18473224771242640294E325E312EB966761BFDF34E830499DCE7654329BD72B9FB1B3FCAF6DBE5F72A