Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 13:19:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 7D42FD3D9002FCD1C687E4E4E82455E3099D91E912BC632FF7C1B27436E0A5C0
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details