Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-18 13:30:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD7E85C31377A3D046CBB81933CDEB95DF3F2B9A13024E04249CD5252E1AAC5A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Those are clearly only insinuations with no basis in fatual evidences. This alone makes the pending note unnecessary and not an "important context" as the note claims to provide.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847200023810801915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD7E85C31377A3D046CBB81933CDEB95DF3F2B9A13024E04249CD5252E1AAC5A
  • createdAtMillis - 1729258242982
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1847200023810801915FD7E85C31377A3D046CBB81933CDEB95DF3F2B9A13024E04249CD5252E1AAC5A