Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-18 23:08:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F4EB8967603C936E351E1E06FD4C346D0F0CC6472F32C4DF267C93A4ACFF9065
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Those are clearly only insinuations with no basis in fatual evidences. This alone makes the pending note unnecessary and not an "important context" as the note claims to provide.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847200023810801915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F4EB8967603C936E351E1E06FD4C346D0F0CC6472F32C4DF267C93A4ACFF9065
  • createdAtMillis - 1729292886605
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1847200023810801915F4EB8967603C936E351E1E06FD4C346D0F0CC6472F32C4DF267C93A4ACFF9065