Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-18 17:01:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7F4B18B84A71BF23FE6F5E3EF2837ECF8AAF2EDBF7C9C26E674B40D0A542B26C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Those are clearly only insinuations with no basis in fatual evidences. This alone makes the pending note unnecessary and not an "important context" as the note claims to provide.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847200023810801915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7F4B18B84A71BF23FE6F5E3EF2837ECF8AAF2EDBF7C9C26E674B40D0A542B26C
  • createdAtMillis - 1729270908757
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18472000238108019157F4B18B84A71BF23FE6F5E3EF2837ECF8AAF2EDBF7C9C26E674B40D0A542B26C