Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-18 13:19:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64A05A4C6F0984C2495102B89E00995DA9CBD1486F2DAA8282BDE8870C0D82F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Those are clearly only insinuations with no basis in fatual evidences. This alone makes the pending note unnecessary and not an "important context" as the note claims to provide.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847200023810801915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 64A05A4C6F0984C2495102B89E00995DA9CBD1486F2DAA8282BDE8870C0D82F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1729257583457
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184720002381080191564A05A4C6F0984C2495102B89E00995DA9CBD1486F2DAA8282BDE8870C0D82F5