Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-18 15:30:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 52F841455ACAD002B2964C9C1686E415F66F5B3B0BBEF8739ED1BA28FCC6E288
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Those are clearly only insinuations with no basis in fatual evidences. This alone makes the pending note unnecessary and not an "important context" as the note claims to provide.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847200023810801915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 52F841455ACAD002B2964C9C1686E415F66F5B3B0BBEF8739ED1BA28FCC6E288
  • createdAtMillis - 1729265431020
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184720002381080191552F841455ACAD002B2964C9C1686E415F66F5B3B0BBEF8739ED1BA28FCC6E288