Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-19 22:53:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6B6CAA9D80BD1F2A99F607633D5A6DB5F57C2D35EE291D9E8FECDABA356F43D2
Participant Details

Original Note:

実際は、後追い研究はされており、インフルエンザワクチン接種者で感染後のウイルス排出量が多いという研究は、再現性がなく、先月の研究でも傾向すら、確認されなかったので、本投稿は事実誤認です(下記でFigure S13,と検索)。 https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/3/9/pgae338/7738343?login=false

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847163612089274548
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6B6CAA9D80BD1F2A99F607633D5A6DB5F57C2D35EE291D9E8FECDABA356F43D2
  • createdAtMillis - 1729378385597
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18471636120892745486B6CAA9D80BD1F2A99F607633D5A6DB5F57C2D35EE291D9E8FECDABA356F43D2