Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-17 20:24:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 06BB8F32FD79957DE6F6313E658B1442FEFB9B31CDEFEF8A00C5264FCFA9C9F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

You just need to try to follow the page and check back in a few seconds, you'll notice you won't be following it at all. So the statement is correct, it is an act of censorship which doesn't have any other rational explanation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847004910300418371
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 06BB8F32FD79957DE6F6313E658B1442FEFB9B31CDEFEF8A00C5264FCFA9C9F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1729196679248
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184700491030041837106BB8F32FD79957DE6F6313E658B1442FEFB9B31CDEFEF8A00C5264FCFA9C9F5