Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-18 05:35:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 84C04E045F57ABE2C70C8BCB73725B113582E091237049F38EBC5D1F2765AA67
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision was reversed by the Supreme Court https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-411_3dq3.pdf Further neither the source provided in the proposed note nor the Fifth Circuit Court's ruling itself ever mention Kamala Harris, so her involvement in any supposed violation is speculation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846984971921031306
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 84C04E045F57ABE2C70C8BCB73725B113582E091237049F38EBC5D1F2765AA67
  • createdAtMillis - 1729229757298
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184698497192103130684C04E045F57ABE2C70C8BCB73725B113582E091237049F38EBC5D1F2765AA67