Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-18 01:47:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1BACBD03E783B643A6D1341B9930DFE849284652D271F71DD76FD32680BC0E61
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision was reversed by the Supreme Court https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-411_3dq3.pdf Further neither the source provided in the proposed note nor the Fifth Circuit Court's ruling itself ever mention Kamala Harris, so her involvement in any supposed violation is speculation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846984971921031306
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1BACBD03E783B643A6D1341B9930DFE849284652D271F71DD76FD32680BC0E61
  • createdAtMillis - 1729216043787
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18469849719210313061BACBD03E783B643A6D1341B9930DFE849284652D271F71DD76FD32680BC0E61