Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-18 15:41:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F43727F1B905FA13FD3F8B9BAB54EB289EC3696CE11BD4B559B11A52EB6AB7C3
Participant Details

Original Note:

‼️ Rate NO on the Proposed Community Note‼️ 1. The study used methodology that is supported by US S.Res.497 - A. 2. The below link proves the proposed CM is factually inaccurate, argumentative, and unnecessary. Vote NO for those reasons, as proven in the .gov link below. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-resolution/497

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846977018677940533
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F43727F1B905FA13FD3F8B9BAB54EB289EC3696CE11BD4B559B11A52EB6AB7C3
  • createdAtMillis - 1729266097994
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1846977018677940533F43727F1B905FA13FD3F8B9BAB54EB289EC3696CE11BD4B559B11A52EB6AB7C3