Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-18 14:43:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF2745525B5B19115C05CE11F162404F88515C0DA1DFA9AEB5CB0F85994A1265
Participant Details

Original Note:

‼️ Rate NO on the Proposed Community Note‼️ 1. The study used methodology that is supported by US S.Res.497 - A. 2. The below link proves the proposed CM is factually inaccurate, argumentative, and unnecessary. Vote NO for those reasons, as proven in the .gov link below. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-resolution/497

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846977018677940533
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF2745525B5B19115C05CE11F162404F88515C0DA1DFA9AEB5CB0F85994A1265
  • createdAtMillis - 1729262580817
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1846977018677940533EF2745525B5B19115C05CE11F162404F88515C0DA1DFA9AEB5CB0F85994A1265