Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-18 11:22:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 65D0DBDE5E21EEB22F3E0FB6D378AA6F25F53F579FEA1A33CB4DAF8EAB2F61C8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Attempted notes did not read the thread or the decision. Decision specifically references defendant's posture & appearance praying as part of conviction. Arresting officers asked about the "nature" of his prayer. It is clear that the mere act of prayer played a preeminent role.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846888659666002174
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 65D0DBDE5E21EEB22F3E0FB6D378AA6F25F53F579FEA1A33CB4DAF8EAB2F61C8
  • createdAtMillis - 1729250571416
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184688865966600217465D0DBDE5E21EEB22F3E0FB6D378AA6F25F53F579FEA1A33CB4DAF8EAB2F61C8