Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-17 16:53:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36506C2A5F0B98CFACED80906383D302DBE7E07DC5E9908CDB0AD80B9A8A81CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Attempted notes did not read the thread or the decision. Decision specifically references defendant's posture & appearance praying as part of conviction. Arresting officers asked about the "nature" of his prayer. It is clear that the mere act of prayer played a preeminent role.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846888659666002174
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36506C2A5F0B98CFACED80906383D302DBE7E07DC5E9908CDB0AD80B9A8A81CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1729184027357
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184688865966600217436506C2A5F0B98CFACED80906383D302DBE7E07DC5E9908CDB0AD80B9A8A81CB