Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-17 16:30:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 034F4C07929A2645FBC35E62D3FA011AA1B8E143BC245EDC6FDF8ADC26C5D404
Participant Details

Original Note:

Attempted notes did not read the thread or the decision. Decision specifically references defendant's posture & appearance praying as part of conviction. Arresting officers asked about the "nature" of his prayer. It is clear that the mere act of prayer played a preeminent role.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846888659666002174
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 034F4C07929A2645FBC35E62D3FA011AA1B8E143BC245EDC6FDF8ADC26C5D404
  • createdAtMillis - 1729182629344
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1846888659666002174034F4C07929A2645FBC35E62D3FA011AA1B8E143BC245EDC6FDF8ADC26C5D404