Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-19 08:06:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AAA41C53210C3894653AF5406B29E3B77D941DBB091AC6C3ADAEEA1F2B08A25D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Alabama's legislature passed a shield law protecting IVF providers. That law is being challenged as unconstitutional in state courts. If the AL courts find that fetuses have state constitutional rights, the shield law will be invalid and IVF will again be illegal in AL. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/14/us/politics/alabamas-ivf-shield-law.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&tgrp=bth&pvid=273E5802-AC27-43FE-94BF-E724AF86A1BC

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846881596219302080
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AAA41C53210C3894653AF5406B29E3B77D941DBB091AC6C3ADAEEA1F2B08A25D
  • createdAtMillis - 1729325174885
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1846881596219302080AAA41C53210C3894653AF5406B29E3B77D941DBB091AC6C3ADAEEA1F2B08A25D