Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-17 15:36:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64E066000850021F12D969E0E2A462AC383DA19744A39331DD965FBDBB4978DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Alabama's legislature passed a shield law protecting IVF providers. That law is being challenged as unconstitutional in state courts. If the AL courts find that fetuses have state constitutional rights, the shield law will be invalid and IVF will again be illegal in AL. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/14/us/politics/alabamas-ivf-shield-law.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&tgrp=bth&pvid=273E5802-AC27-43FE-94BF-E724AF86A1BC

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846881596219302080
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 64E066000850021F12D969E0E2A462AC383DA19744A39331DD965FBDBB4978DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1729179405054
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184688159621930208064E066000850021F12D969E0E2A462AC383DA19744A39331DD965FBDBB4978DD