Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-17 15:39:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ACF59A010E7A7B1050E6A4A8E641E392516A8BCA298F60B556EC2CCF5CDF0875
Participant Details

Original Note:

どちらの党が「汚い」か、どちらの党が「きれい」かは基準によって変わる個人の判断なので、コミュニティノートではなくリプライで議論すべきであり、コミュニティノートとして不適切です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846755140541600197
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ACF59A010E7A7B1050E6A4A8E641E392516A8BCA298F60B556EC2CCF5CDF0875
  • createdAtMillis - 1729179546372
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1846755140541600197ACF59A010E7A7B1050E6A4A8E641E392516A8BCA298F60B556EC2CCF5CDF0875