Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-17 13:26:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6D9E4FDE46506626DC4FFFFF16FB97B16A17F8BD2B2E909A3CED0652A0156005
Participant Details

Original Note:

どちらの党が「汚い」か、どちらの党が「きれい」かは基準によって変わる個人の判断なので、コミュニティノートではなくリプライで議論すべきであり、コミュニティノートとして不適切です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846755140541600197
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6D9E4FDE46506626DC4FFFFF16FB97B16A17F8BD2B2E909A3CED0652A0156005
  • createdAtMillis - 1729171569416
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18467551405416001976D9E4FDE46506626DC4FFFFF16FB97B16A17F8BD2B2E909A3CED0652A0156005