Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-17 14:07:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60EEFBD0D6FB2872D52221FA34C3451F9E1119F3B9DFDE9EC52C9CBBA24F4A5D
Participant Details

Original Note:

どちらの党が「汚い」か、どちらの党が「きれい」かは基準によって変わる個人の判断なので、コミュニティノートではなくリプライで議論すべきであり、コミュニティノートとして不適切です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846755140541600197
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 60EEFBD0D6FB2872D52221FA34C3451F9E1119F3B9DFDE9EC52C9CBBA24F4A5D
  • createdAtMillis - 1729174052021
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184675514054160019760EEFBD0D6FB2872D52221FA34C3451F9E1119F3B9DFDE9EC52C9CBBA24F4A5D