Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-17 04:01:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E5F108AF3848EF095113AB24E8D96BB827F6FC6AB12449114915F6018EEC1B95
Participant Details

Original Note:

Discussing the facts of a legal case in an unemotional manner is the surest path to justice. This practice has no political bias, and is not therefore of only one side, or extreme in any way. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1850&context=faculty-publications#:~:text=Judicial%20dispassion:%20some%20history,6

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846727752981836278
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E5F108AF3848EF095113AB24E8D96BB827F6FC6AB12449114915F6018EEC1B95
  • createdAtMillis - 1729137699212
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1846727752981836278E5F108AF3848EF095113AB24E8D96BB827F6FC6AB12449114915F6018EEC1B95