Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-17 03:29:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C49E057F01C6524A08D722A8578801934C1CF4E9DF6C34EC453CEECEC21AB3B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Discussing the facts of a legal case in an unemotional manner is the surest path to justice. This practice has no political bias, and is not therefore of only one side, or extreme in any way. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1850&context=faculty-publications#:~:text=Judicial%20dispassion:%20some%20history,6

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846727752981836278
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C49E057F01C6524A08D722A8578801934C1CF4E9DF6C34EC453CEECEC21AB3B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1729135781908
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1846727752981836278C49E057F01C6524A08D722A8578801934C1CF4E9DF6C34EC453CEECEC21AB3B4