Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-17 03:58:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C3EF254B7C3263E5C448F00FD0486B7CC2284F67772BAA5BF1A1673C2268056
Participant Details

Original Note:

Discussing the facts of a legal case in an unemotional manner is the surest path to justice. This practice has no political bias, and is not therefore of only one side, or extreme in any way. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1850&context=faculty-publications#:~:text=Judicial%20dispassion:%20some%20history,6

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846727752981836278
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C3EF254B7C3263E5C448F00FD0486B7CC2284F67772BAA5BF1A1673C2268056
  • createdAtMillis - 1729137505631
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18467277529818362783C3EF254B7C3263E5C448F00FD0486B7CC2284F67772BAA5BF1A1673C2268056