Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-17 19:20:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 31BCD639592004DD7A5C974C5148AB61D8960085DA58F0D52DEB4503B5E3F4B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Discussing the facts of a legal case in an unemotional manner is the surest path to justice. This practice has no political bias, and is not therefore of only one side, or extreme in any way. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1850&context=faculty-publications#:~:text=Judicial%20dispassion:%20some%20history,6

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846727752981836278
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 31BCD639592004DD7A5C974C5148AB61D8960085DA58F0D52DEB4503B5E3F4B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1729192850368
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184672775298183627831BCD639592004DD7A5C974C5148AB61D8960085DA58F0D52DEB4503B5E3F4B3