Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-17 02:33:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 269F9DC14FCE467F8585A10FFBFB79CED52C8A6DB661D244C3A1A8258F42E262
Participant Details

Original Note:

Discussing the facts of a legal case in an unemotional manner is the surest path to justice. This practice has no political bias, and is not therefore of only one side, or extreme in any way. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1850&context=faculty-publications#:~:text=Judicial%20dispassion:%20some%20history,6

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846727752981836278
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 269F9DC14FCE467F8585A10FFBFB79CED52C8A6DB661D244C3A1A8258F42E262
  • createdAtMillis - 1729132435519
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1846727752981836278269F9DC14FCE467F8585A10FFBFB79CED52C8A6DB661D244C3A1A8258F42E262