Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 16:08:02 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F9B448A4476DBFAF0495278F1E83A9DD863CBC2D1C66D269DD359FAA867821A5
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details