Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-19 14:48:47 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F793B5C25979C9E2F5602E862DD2635E84DB7C6D72ECEED1CCC0C79B155FBF45
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details