Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 06:09:33 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F7384048ABA1CA5FD246A66DA62D246FAFB8AF70C8C6DE1B6751EAAB96F16F5D
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details