Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 07:26:39 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F04A3C8F4AA6549B8D9DAB9188B94F35AB89DFF6CF2E119C873867F2DA62D0B8
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details