Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 13:52:08 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: EF7DD046FFF2B3E71E2DAA026E99D56B88CB1D2799C671FD87493A74178D5C01
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details