Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 22:27:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: DB37315D260545B3EF27E79D5F346DE037DE3C77D2E6DC3DB75B697264E155C1
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details