Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 00:05:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D3B0F1FBC3EC64E3F42262EEAD6F78F99806AD8D7878FDE405304FB189903E92
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details