Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 09:03:08 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: CFE7C16B67CD5430A654B53FA3ED338DD8EFA0221F18D0CBA5E357A34A2ABF2E
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details