Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 18:17:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C29D3D01283CB2C3173EF1E8A1E57DA35A875F1A8AAC3B97F0710AA75E5C1C7F
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details