Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 11:59:50 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C084790DB7F52BDA7606CAD7D0DDDA0D4569980410003ABFD0E3A620F2A20CFA
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details