Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-18 17:25:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B953C1B0FC4F92D0423BD177CC283EE2888DE0826369631D0C4B6C030A106323
Participant Details

Original Note:

The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846623106258948174
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B953C1B0FC4F92D0423BD177CC283EE2888DE0826369631D0C4B6C030A106323
  • createdAtMillis - 1729272321054
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1846623106258948174B953C1B0FC4F92D0423BD177CC283EE2888DE0826369631D0C4B6C030A106323