Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-02-15 05:47:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B88C1E26FB32116C4FD67B8BC85EEF3B381F016676A7EF23A72E20F21F57DF4A
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details