Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 11:10:23 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B18DE3512C57479DAE00E7116B7AC2EF66AEF5E5C7E6ABE9FEAC91C98FEF8792
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details