Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 13:23:54 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 9E6EA7C8B7A9EF387E47A9A2496D41E5A1004BDF420832A2E1AC15BE3BC0C824
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details