Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 13:24:29 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 9DE960BDDEA5B4F3D5B33405B8DD89D0A8B18136529E7E77116566C6F5201B08
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details