Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 09:34:21 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 99C8942C19C2A1CF2DFFF39D2F2AB7F9D91179AD19CC7D5EA77B3891E71E69E8
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details