Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 06:37:55 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 841FB32B5E67E0FC6A6DC84087E20966251E15FC98D12E8572CF57794CC9F4B1
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details