Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 16:45:54 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 7DD31E31A3EE1BDDF5E2772856488245AF10EA56BDE9DD6E9F91CC836A40E59F
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details