Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-16 18:48:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 7CC926C31A2D9365405F3C3684D5DD3A3C38277A632D333E0E8CCC849CB0F5F8
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details