Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-16 23:39:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 7B9DD5834E3DC82848A741F9735DCB57FC3B22911EC4539D8E5956DE4E3D4C86
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details