Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 09:26:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 797C0D5CD1446D31B70D62B188DF2DA2D83BF3819C8B8C0CAA3ED8758F79B2BD
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details