Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 02:13:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 77D975F8610C5DE77517CAF77A3A6A055F28549F5B8827510E4FA5FCE8192714
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details