Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-19 20:23:32 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 70C2EF0978536658F1426FDE68E9F60D5A8AD81E8A0A9FE2C8E68D79B789FEC5
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details