Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 13:37:19 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 67AED9EFED54254586C3B2AC7377C2365E51B00A4BBE6A942395E5EFA7E7C41A
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details